About Altus Labs

Open Research at the Intersection of Finance and Technology

We publish open-source quantitative research exploring how markets compound wealth over time — bridging the gap between how portfolios are constructed and how returns actually behave under non-linear dynamics.

The Structural Void

Why Current Approaches Fall Short

Modern Portfolio Theory, Risk Parity, and traditional 60/40 allocations share a common characteristic: they tend to be pro-cyclical. These frameworks can increase leverage at exactly the point where systemic risk is elevated.

As options adoption and algorithmic passive investing increase, markets become prone to abrupt liquidity vacuums. Traditional allocations often lack explicit dynamic tail-risk hedging— they optimize for the middle of the distribution while the tails are where wealth is actually made and destroyed.

This creates a volatility feedback loop that can amplify drawdowns precisely when capital preservation matters most.

The Ergodicity Problem

Traditional finance optimizes for ensemble averages—what happens across many investors. But you experience a single sequence of returns over time. These are fundamentally different optimization targets.

Pro-Cyclical Construction

Risk parity and volatility targeting increase leverage when volatility is low and decrease it when volatility spikes—which may not align with what long-term compounding requires.

Transparency Gap

Many institutional-grade strategies come with high minimums, lock-up periods, and limited visibility into methodology. There's room for more transparent approaches.

Our Approach

Research Philosophy

Our research is grounded in three principles: optimise for geometric compounding rather than ensemble averages, measure endogenous risk before it manifests in price, and publish methodology transparently so results are fully reproducible.

Geometric Compounding

Our research focuses on what matters for a single investor over time: the geometric mean growth rate. This means understanding why survival and drawdown avoidance dominate expected return maximisation in the long run.

Endogenous Risk

We study how systemic stress builds endogenously — through position crowding, liquidity withdrawal, and reflexive feedback loops — and how convex portfolio construction can exploit the non-ergodic nature of these dynamics.

Open Methodology

All published research includes the methodology, assumptions, and limitations in sufficient detail for independent reproduction. No black boxes.

Vision

Making Institutional-Grade Research Accessible

Quantitative research on convexity, tail risk, and non-ergodic compounding is typically locked behind institutional paywalls or buried in academic papers that don't translate to practitioner workflows.

We publish at the intersection — rigorous enough to be useful, accessible enough to reach practitioners, portfolio managers, and independent researchers who want to incorporate these ideas into their own thinking.

Our research covers portfolio construction through a convexity lens, systematic stress detection through a convexity and non-ergodicity lens, and the backtesting and validation methodology that underpins it all.

Research Areas

Non-Ergodic Portfolio Theory

Geometric compounding, volatility drag, and survival-first construction

Market Microstructure & Convexity

Options pricing, volatility surfaces, and asymmetric payoff design

Endogenous Risk & Convexity

Non-ergodic frameworks applied to systemic stress detection and tail-risk positioning

Backtesting & Statistical Validation

Methodology for distinguishing genuine edge from noise